A Suggestion
I came back to see my nowhere near real SB totals and I want to offer another suggestion. This "game" is a simulation the same way masturbation is sex. At 29 and 26 years old Piazza and Mauer both threw out 26% of base stealers, which means 74% of the guys who ran were successful. Not only were Alomar and Raines 0-4 against Piazza, they're now only 50% successful after their games with Mauer. Raines was thrown out 3 times in his first 4 attempts even though in 1987 Tim Raines stole 50 and was only caught 5 times but one steal and 3 caughts after not playing any elite arm catchers in my first 6 games.
And that's on top of Alomar and Raines only attempting to steal 10 bases in their 17 times on base that weren't triples or HR's despite my 100% setting just on stealing 2nd alone. If you add my jacking up the steal 3rd to a third of the time too it means they're attempting way, way UNDER 100% for 2nd base and 3rd base COMBINED even if you take out any time a guy was in front of Raines because Raines is in front of Alomar and them both being on together should result in a double steal attempt 100% of the time if my setting is 100% yet they've only attempted 10 steals.
Now, let's have the math failure scammers running this site reply behind me how all this BS is a math thing so that the marks will think it makes sense, the math failure marks playing this game and thinking anything they do matters. When Raines ends up with a 60% or less successful steals rate against catchers who were 74% unsuccessful before you even count the elite job Raines did stealing bases in 1987 this game will be proven as the sham and scam it is. One of the lying pay to play games is claiming "accurate 97% of the time". Yes, and I'm the best UFC fighter who ever lived too. 100% means ALWAYS. If it doesn't do what I say to ALWAYS do then nothing we do matters when this bad program inaccurately runs stats on baseball. If the program either ignores or doesn't understand what 100% is then it's not a simulation. It's just jacking off.
And that's on top of Alomar and Raines only attempting to steal 10 bases in their 17 times on base that weren't triples or HR's despite my 100% setting just on stealing 2nd alone. If you add my jacking up the steal 3rd to a third of the time too it means they're attempting way, way UNDER 100% for 2nd base and 3rd base COMBINED even if you take out any time a guy was in front of Raines because Raines is in front of Alomar and them both being on together should result in a double steal attempt 100% of the time if my setting is 100% yet they've only attempted 10 steals.
Now, let's have the math failure scammers running this site reply behind me how all this BS is a math thing so that the marks will think it makes sense, the math failure marks playing this game and thinking anything they do matters. When Raines ends up with a 60% or less successful steals rate against catchers who were 74% unsuccessful before you even count the elite job Raines did stealing bases in 1987 this game will be proven as the sham and scam it is. One of the lying pay to play games is claiming "accurate 97% of the time". Yes, and I'm the best UFC fighter who ever lived too. 100% means ALWAYS. If it doesn't do what I say to ALWAYS do then nothing we do matters when this bad program inaccurately runs stats on baseball. If the program either ignores or doesn't understand what 100% is then it's not a simulation. It's just jacking off.