Back to Boards

Assigning Stats


Assigning Stats

In 2010 Justin Morneau struck out 62 times in 296 at bats one every 4.77. For his career he was around one K per 5.7. He has a 99 rating in this assigns stats game and he has 9 K's in 27 at bat's for me so far. For you miserable math failure Sarahs, that's exactly one in 3. No legit simulation can take a 4.77 to 5.7 K batter and drop him to one in three. 9 K's is already 18 percent of the K's Morneau had that season. A legit sim of anything would make the results come out somewhere between the worst and the best. Assigning him a 9 K's in 27 result when it's almost impossible a guy with a high of 110 K's in a season and only 2 seasons over a hundred K's ever struck out 9 times in 27 in his life.

This game does not nor did it ever simulate baseball games or stats based on anything. It both assigns totally random, nowhere near the careers of the athletes stats but more than that, there are built in sabotages, like how the scammer commish running this con claims 100% isn't actually 100%. A computer can not ignore a setting unless it's told to ignore it. If there's a 100% setting and the results are actually 66 or less percent, it was programmed to screw you. Any of you defending these assigned stats and built in screw jobs need to just admit you're stupid marks instead of living in denial like you are now. You were conned and you wasted tons of time making moves in a game where nothing you do matters. It's an assigning random stats game, not a simulation. You're wasting your time and nothing you do in this scam matters. You'd get what you get the same stats if you put any setting at ZERO percent or 100%. I've had sac bunt 44% with 0 and 22% with one for 8 games now and ZERO sac bunts. This isn't a simulation and nothing you do changes the nonsensical randomness of the assigned stats. Believe it Sarahs.

Re: Assigning Stats

True he seems to be somehow incapable of understanding some rather simple logic. Still, one cannot help admiring his perseverance.

Re: Re: Assigning Stats

Truly a marvel of the highest order. Astounding how hard he tries to sound smart by throwing in numbers and demand absolute precision based on simulations

Re: Assigning Stats

The Unablabber's latest manifesto.

But, I completely agree with you, the use of paragraphs and the parsing of ideas into readable units is so passe.

So disappointed that I am conditioned by The Man into tapping the return key. This "sim" has not done one blessed thing to correct my inability to achieve the superior run-on method of expression.

Re: Assigning Stats

It really is too bad we no longer Identify or fund proper mental health care anymore!!

Re: Assigning Stats

You don't need to call the FBI just look out your front window they probably have you under observation

Re: Assigning Stats

TLDNR

Re: Assigning Stats

Only a 27 AB sampling ????

Re: Re: Assigning Stats

yeah the funny thing about that PLPL is that I quickly found a game log of real life Justin Morneau from 2016 and he had a strech of 4 games (8/30-9/2/2016) where he struck out 9 times in 16 at bats. https://www.espn.com/mlb/player/gam..

Re: Assigning Stats

Impossible! Didn't happen! Not realistic!

Re: Assigning Stats

Not to mention he obviously can’t understand the concept that Morneau never faced the best strikeout pitchers of all time every single at bat and if he had, that 120 ks per 600 AB he had in 2010 would obviously be much higher than that. Justin seems to be tracking as he always does in 1970-present. Which this genius would know if he looked at his player card.

But I look forward to the outstanding sim he’s going to build himself. He sounds like someone who clearly has the smarts and discipline to do it!

Re: Re: Assigning Stats

An unfortunate reality of social media posting boards is that some folks feel it's an appropriate venue for demonstrating that they haven't quite yet resolved their unhappy childhood.

Re: Assigning Stats

As soon as Jason completes his superior Sim, I am OUTTA HERE!! 😂🤣😂

Re: Re: Assigning Stats

LOL

Re: Re: Assigning Stats

I still want to know if that die that kept landing on 5 was a 5 when Gus retrieved it after he defenestrated it?

Re: Assigning Stats

You know, I was wondering the other day about how quiet it had become on the boards. I can remember the good old days (or bad old days) when a rabid poster, much like a comet, would streak across the PC sky's, sowing gibberish and mayhem and curious logic. Looks like those days are back. Boredom and mental health problems are a bi_ch!!!

- The Sheik

Re: Assigning Stats

All of this negative talk about stoners is going to end up giving me a complex....I'm already paranoid...