Back to Boards

Hey Sarahs


Hey Sarahs

I have NO on sub for Johnny Bench. The built in screw job ignoring of my settings just had Jason Kendall pinch-run for Bench. That isn't a simulating ridiculous stats problem. That's a nothing we put in any setting actually matters f-u*c_k over. No means yes. 100% means 60% or less and you stoners so unwilling to admit you've been conned, can't admit your stupidity, can't admit your wife loves f-u^c_king another man think you still all have 14 inch di-c*ks. You're insane and addicts and stoners. Don't reply stoned any more. This time I'm out for sure and I think I'll contact somebody in the government to give this scam a looking over, see just what a con it is. Donate money so your no gets ignored. Yes, I'm sure somebody will put a stop to this con fairly soon when the program is examined and found out NOT to be a simulation but you stoners and addicts keep donating.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

If this is Avilla he’s doing a truly amazing job. Or maybe it’s Brenduplantis? We’ve had some doozies over the years.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

DELUSIONAL
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

This person is insane
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

If you are contacting the FBI please say hello to my friend Sgt. Stadanko , he works in vice.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

how are we getting scammed in a free game?
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

6/22 tjm Random Chatter 1 0
This HAS to be Shiek, lmao.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

i have to say that whoever this is, is actually a pretty smart and logical fellow. these arent just incomprehensible rants. he IS making points, albeit ones most of us probably dont agree with. and certainly any positive points hes making are lost under the extreme trolling. it IS a great troll job tho
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

If you allow pinch Running any player can be run for--- ANYONE - the Sim will not pinch run until like the 8th inning - and choosing Kendall, another Catcher who can also run a bit couldn't of hurt that much.

If you select do not substitute it simply means not to pull him for a DEFENSIVE REPLACEMENT late in games

Perhaps if you knew a little more about how the SIM operates you wouldn't be so abrasive and Stupid, it did exactly what you asked it to do, in a late inning close game it pinch ran for a slow runner and also provided you with a serviceable replacement

You really need to play some games and learn some of the nuances before you spout off and insult others.

Abraham Lincoln once said - " It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, then to open your mouth and remove all doubt"

This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

If you look closely, you'll notice that there isn't a pinch run section when editing your main lineups. That's only in the strategy section. Ergo, this post means jack squat when ****ing about you "not having a sub on for Bench." You don't like it, then toggle it off

And something tells me the government wouldn't give two ****s about what's happening here so please stfu and go get a day job
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

Go touch some grass kid
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

If you look closely whoever idiotically said look closely pinch running is a substitution jack-a-s^s. Pinch hitting and pinch running are substitutions otherwise Jason Kendall and Johnny Bench would have both remained in the game you 60 IQ mental midget. This is just another 100% isn't always situation with all the addicts and stoners defending it with no logic behind any of it. And the utter morons claiming Morneau is facing the best pitchers in history and that explains everything on his K rate doubling... um, morons, David Wright is batting .484/.724 for a team with only 4 K's against the same pitchers. This game assigns random stats. There's nothing baseball about it and it sure as hell isn't a simulation. It's a donation scam designed for stupid marks like you. David Wright isn't good enough to do that and Morneau isn't bad enough to do what he's doing either. Assigns stats RANDOMLY. No setting you choose and no move you make will change the outcome of anything this non-simulation game is going to do to your team or for your team.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

David Wright has a career .218 average in the league in question. So now you don’t know math or baseball. If you knew math, you’d know the sample sizes you’re talking about don’t matter. If you knew baseball, you’d know clusters of success or failure don’t translate to final outcomes.

But you do know trolling. You’re crushing it there for sure.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

You're really an unbelievable moron, huh? You're making my argument for me Sarah with your wrong statements about sample size. If Tim Raines gets caught stealing 3 times in the first 4 games and he only got caught 5 times. 50/5, in all of the season's stats he's playing, the small sample size makes it WORSE Sarah. It means he's already been caught 60% of his entire season total in the first 4 games or like a 40 HR batter hitting 24 HR's in 6 games. You complete moron claiming the complete opposite of reality. When Raines ends up with 20 or more caught stealings to end this season it will be the same as if this assigns stats game had assigned Barry Bonds 300 HR's in a season based on his 73 original total, you can't do simple math moron, mental midget Sarah.

Sample size has zero to do with Alomar only having 4 steal attempts through 11 games despite me having steal 2nd at 100%, always moron, for the first games and 66% the last few games. Alomar hasn't even attempted a steal since game 5, we just played 11, and he got 3 in that game, so he's only ATTEMPTED to steal in 2 of the 11 games my team has played despite my jacked up settings, you moron, moron, moron and sample size has nothing to do with this assigns stats game ignoring my settings completely because that's not even counting my jacked up steal 3rd numbers too that have been ignored.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

Hey, lying moron commish. David Wright is on my Horsemen team and is most certainly not batting .218. If you weren't so busy counting your donation scam money, you might have bothered to check that before you lied in order to make this assigns stats game/donation scam seem legit. By the way morons, that 's an everybody in baseball history league where David Wright is performing better for my team than Ty Cobb, DiMaggio and Mel Ott. Go fornicate yourself with that David Wright BS scammer commish.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

Hey sane people here , i figured it out, this friday mercury ,venus , mars , jupiter and saturn will all be aligned. And the big hand on the clock just hit 3
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

Yes, you bubbles are the "sane" one. You must be because no insane person ever thinks they're insane. Like Manson and others you write nonsense you thought up while you were under the influence and then claim anybody not agreeing with your insanity and stupidity is actually the insane one. You're defending 100% not being ALWAYS as "understandable" and that makes you the "sane" one. 100% is actually 60% in your world and that makes you as smart and as sane as Chuck Manson.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

I did miss something though. Alomar has 6 attempts, 4 steals and 2 caught, but he's been on base 12 times with both 2nd and 3rd to attempt stealing so he's UNDER 50% even attempting to steal despite me having 100% and 66% in all games so far. Raines was thrown out again somewhere too, making one steal and 4 caughts, taken from stats in a season he was 55/5, meaning he already has 80% as many caughts in less than 11 games because I haven't started him every time and his one steal every 3 games is about half that to go along with his never would happen with Piazza being one of the catchers in the 4 caughts in this assign stats to players that would never happen donation scam. Alomar may have been on more times due to fielders' choices but any way you do the math "sane" bubbles, UNDER 50% attempts isn't either 100% or 66% is it? I mean if you weren't defending your boyfriend and this donation scam the same way Charles Manson defended his insanity. That's not a "quirk" bubbles Manson. That's an ignoring my settings completely.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

I thought this guy left
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

Is this guy for real?

As soon as he said the bit about getting the government involved, I knew instantly that this was a massive troll job 🤣🤣
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

you should see what he wrote after I made a post about ohtani. We have one of those people again, he even has bad mouthed gbacci. Too bad we cant talk about real mlb without this garbage. But like i said the planets are all aligned lol
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

The time and energy invested in bad mouthing what is essentially a free site designed (and quite well, I must say) purely for fun and amusement is funny and sad.

It’s like going to the mall at Christmas to heckle Santa Claus.

This **** gets no more of my time.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

yep, TOTALLY normal to compare a PC owner to, um, Charles Manson because you disagree with him about baseball 🤣
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

This HAS to be Shiek, lmao.

Jeez - don't attach my name to this nonsense !!!


- The Real Sheik
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

The day no one responds to Jason's needy, attention-seeking rants will be the day his threads sink to the lower depths where they belong and he'll need to drop trow and expose himself elsewhere in hopes of gratifying his mistaken notion that exhibitionism can somehow resolve the issues of his unhappy childhood.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

What the hell is he smoking? Damn…. If you hate the game that much, then leave. Didn’t realize we were being forced to stay, or donate for that matter. Get a grip on life….
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

@nuroc, agreed... will see if this dies on the vine, if not I'll just start shutting down the threads. It's been entertaining for a bit. Especially with this crew's abilities to launch a zinger. :)
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

You people keep claiming I'm wrong with Twitter replies. In the real world where people aren't Twitter scholars, ya know a 60 IQ making you the smart one at Twitter, if you say somebody is wrong without saying anything else, you haven't proven the person wrong. I know fully that's how it works on Twitter but saying "You're wrong." doesn't actually prove the person is wrong. They may be wrong but without you explaining why, you haven't proven anything. Now go back to smoking your joint and looking at somebody with their tongue hanging out on Twitter, which is everybody under 25 in every picture on Twitter and everywhere else for that matter. Nothing says smart and nothing shows you to be a more independent thinker than baa baaing along with the other sheep as you post tongue hanging out selfies. Picasso did that, right? Every painting was a selfie of him with his tongue hanging out. If not your joint then go back to your pills, meth, heroin, booze or whatever others that makes you insanely live in a dream world where you believe you're smart and you really just told me off big time.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

Of course you're leading up to shutting down the threads moron commish. You can't have me in here every day exposing this scam. You let people go as one moron claimed because it makes it seem like you're patient and understanding instead of the criminal liar you are. This site is ILLEGAL! It's not a simulation site and it sure has nothing to do with baseball. It's an assigns random stats to everybody while what we alleged "team mangers" do changes nothing and you make a fortune off ads and donations from the 60 IQ jackasses too stupid to know what a scam this is. Every setting other than when to remove the pitcher is ignored completely. Sim managers are putting bad defensive subs in for some of the greatest defenders in history and pinch-hitting scrubs for DiMaggio and Mike Trout. Not a simulation, not baseball. A money-making scam where people are paying you because they're stupid enough to think anything they did caused their team to win or lose. You're a liar and a criminal, a rich liar and a rich criminal, because this "free site" has ads on Google search. Only the sites making good money can do that but morons think because it's free kind ole you is running a charity here instead of a huge money-making scam. Go fornicate yourself.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

Wait, does anyone actually still say "fornicate" anymore? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

I heard it the other day at a wedding-- The Best man said Fornication like this we should have sprung for GOOD Champagne
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

Dude that’s not how it works at all. Gbacci puts a lot of his own resources into the site, and is always making improvements to try and make the game more enjoyable for all of us who live our own baseball careers out through this game. As far as your grievances with the game itself, I’ve never had any of these issues and I’m sure most of the people here haven’t either. If you had expressed your issues politely and respectfully, Guy and other Veterans on the site would have tried their best to help you out, and tell you why you’re doing wrong. You’ve lost that privilege now, I think. Pretty much everyone here wants to watch new players succeed and grow as a user. So you can either sit down, shut up, and try and learn this game and prove us wrong, or you can leave the site. Because as of now, it will be pretty tough for you to gain trust and a good reputation on this site, let alone, join any Custom leagues. Also, people pay because they want to open their own leagues that all have a multitude of creative twists on the actual MLB season. They pay because they appreciate how hard Guy works to make this site enjoyable for, well, not everyone obviously. And the ADs are there because this is a free site, and every site has to be paid for by the domain owner, meaning that the donations and ad revenue Guy gets goes mostly right back into the site and turning it into what it is today. This site has seen a lot of people like you come and go over the years, some very recently, others, long ago. But the trend has been that those people get frustrated when people don’t want to make a trade with them because of the way they have treated people on the site, or they are banned from and majority of custom leagues. The trend is that they eventually apologize, and then leave the site. So say what you want about Guy and this game we love, you will not, under any circumstances, deter us from it.

Epitome31
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

Go pay $20 per team to go play StratoMatic or the many other sims out there and go tell them they are stealing people's money, because in that case you *might* actually be right... but that would require you have $20 to spend, which is highly unlikely.

I haven't muted you yet because it's so dang entertaining... every word you say only strengthens the merits of the sim... but alas, it's starting to get annoying, and that's why you'll soon be muted.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

Interesting how someone with limited critical thinking skills and an even more limited vocabulary thinks that the more he garnishes his incoherent arguments with recurring buzzwords the more likely he'll win converts to an alternative universe where he's seen as a beacon of reason rather than just another delusional flogger who thinks public masturbation is a groovy way to use a social media soap box.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

Now that I think about it , there was a game back in the 80's for the commodore 64 called micro league wrestling , but i still dont see how you go from shohei ohtani to that. Pro baseball started in 1876 so doing something that has never been done before is quite an achievement.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

Whoa dude you just seem to have one conspiracy theory after another thinking this sim is rigged or something. I wouldn't be surprised if you were a former player on here that got kicked a whiles back because of complaining or trying to cheat on here. Guy has made this baseball simulation one of the most entertaining ones that is currently out there! You don't like it...then buzz off! If you want to complain about something do it in a constructive and civil manner dude...

Seems like someone's been smoking one too many blunts here....
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Re: Hey Sarahs

Y’all need to stop bashing the blunts. Don’t be a prude. The whole world would be better if more blunts were being passed around.

Don’t hate. Appreciate.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.

Re: Hey Sarahs

Josh with the pro-blunt post, seems like a fitting way to end this thread. I haven't heard "stoner" get thrown around as an insult since the '90s.
This thread has been closed. View our content policy here.