Assigning Stats
In 2010 Justin Morneau struck out 62 times in 296 at bats one every 4.77. For his career he was around one K per 5.7. He has a 99 rating in this assigns stats game and he has 9 K's in 27 at bat's for me so far. For you miserable math failure Sarahs, that's exactly one in 3. No legit simulation can take a 4.77 to 5.7 K batter and drop him to one in three. 9 K's is already 18 percent of the K's Morneau had that season. A legit sim of anything would make the results come out somewhere between the worst and the best. Assigning him a 9 K's in 27 result when it's almost impossible a guy with a high of 110 K's in a season and only 2 seasons over a hundred K's ever struck out 9 times in 27 in his life.
This game does not nor did it ever simulate baseball games or stats based on anything. It both assigns totally random, nowhere near the careers of the athletes stats but more than that, there are built in sabotages, like how the scammer commish running this con claims 100% isn't actually 100%. A computer can not ignore a setting unless it's told to ignore it. If there's a 100% setting and the results are actually 66 or less percent, it was programmed to screw you. Any of you defending these assigned stats and built in screw jobs need to just admit you're stupid marks instead of living in denial like you are now. You were conned and you wasted tons of time making moves in a game where nothing you do matters. It's an assigning random stats game, not a simulation. You're wasting your time and nothing you do in this scam matters. You'd get what you get the same stats if you put any setting at ZERO percent or 100%. I've had sac bunt 44% with 0 and 22% with one for 8 games now and ZERO sac bunts. This isn't a simulation and nothing you do changes the nonsensical randomness of the assigned stats. Believe it Sarahs.
This game does not nor did it ever simulate baseball games or stats based on anything. It both assigns totally random, nowhere near the careers of the athletes stats but more than that, there are built in sabotages, like how the scammer commish running this con claims 100% isn't actually 100%. A computer can not ignore a setting unless it's told to ignore it. If there's a 100% setting and the results are actually 66 or less percent, it was programmed to screw you. Any of you defending these assigned stats and built in screw jobs need to just admit you're stupid marks instead of living in denial like you are now. You were conned and you wasted tons of time making moves in a game where nothing you do matters. It's an assigning random stats game, not a simulation. You're wasting your time and nothing you do in this scam matters. You'd get what you get the same stats if you put any setting at ZERO percent or 100%. I've had sac bunt 44% with 0 and 22% with one for 8 games now and ZERO sac bunts. This isn't a simulation and nothing you do changes the nonsensical randomness of the assigned stats. Believe it Sarahs.
